Woman Abuse Screening Tool

Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST)
Judith Belle Brown‚ Barbara Lent‚ Gail Schmidt‚ and George Sas‚ 2000
ابزار غربالگری بد رفتاری با زن
Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST)
1. In general‚ how would you describe your relationship?
2. Do you and your partner work out arguments with:
3. Do arguments ever result in you feeling down or bad about yourse1f?
4. Do arguments ever result in hitting‚ kicking or pushing?
5. Do you ever feel frightened by what your partner says or does?
6. Has your partner ever abused you physically?
7. Has your partner ever abused you emotionally?
8. Has your partner ever abused you sexually?
Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST) – Short
Brown‚ Barbara Lent‚ Pamela J. Brett‚ George Sas‚ 1996
1. In general‚ how would you describe your relationship?
2. Do you and your partner work out arguments with:
شرح سایت روان سنجی: خشونت جسمی و عاطفی را می سنجد.
اعتبار: آلفا کرونباخ 0.75
نمره گذاری:
Item 1: A lot of tension‚ Some tension‚ No tension
Item 2:  Great difficulty?‚ Some difficulty?‚ No difficulty?
Items 3-8: Often‚ Sometimes‚ Never
To score this instrument‚ the responses are assigned a number. For the first question “a lot of tension” gets a score of 1 and the other 2 get a 0. For the second question “great difficulty” gets a score of 1 and the other 2 get 0. For the remaining questions “often” gets a score of 1‚ “sometimes” gets a score of 2‚ and “never” gets a score of 3. (Nelson et al‚ 2004)
چگونگی دستیابی
منبع و ماخذ
Brown JB‚ Lent B‚ Schmidt G‚ Sas G. (2000). Application of the woman abuse screening tool (WAST) and WAST-short in the family practice setting. The Journal of Family Practice‚ 49‚ 896-903.
Brown JB‚ Lent B‚ Brett PJ‚ Sas G‚ Pederson LL. (1996). Development of the Woman Abuse Screening Tool for use in family practice. Family Medicine‚ 28‚ 422-28.
Nelson. Heidi‚ Nygren. Peggy‚ McInerney. Yasmin‚. (2004). Screening for Family and Intimate Partner Violence. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Systematic Evidence Review; 28. www.ahrq.gov