Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (FACES II)
Olson‚ Bell‚ & Portner‚ 1991
مقیاس سازگاری خانواده و ارزیابی انسجام
1. We are supportive of each other during difficult times.
2. In our relationship‚ it is easy for both of us to express our opinion.
3. It is easier to discuss problems with people outside the marriage than with my partner.
4. We each have input regarding major family decisions.
5. We spend time together when we are home.
6. We are flexible in how we handle differences.
7. We do things together.
8. We discuss problems and feel good about the solutions.
9. In our marriage‚ we each go our own way.
10. We shift household responsibilities between us.
11. We know each other’s close friends.
12. It is hard to know what the rules are in our relationship.
13. We consult each other on personal decisions.
14. We freely say what we want.
15. We have difficulty thinking of things to do together.
16. We have a good balance of leadership in our family.
17. We feel very close to each other.
18. We operate on the principle of fairness in our marriage.
19. I feel closer to people outside the marriage than to my partner.
20. We try new ways of dealing with problems.
21. I go along with what my partner decides to do.
22. In our marriage‚ we share responsibilities.
23. We like to spend our free time with each other.
24. It is difficult to get a rule change in our relationship.
25. We avoid each other at home.
26. When problems arise‚ we compromise.
27. We approve of each other’s friends.
28. We are afraid to say what is on our minds.
29. We tend to do more things separately.
30. We share interests and hobbies with each other.
شرح سایت روان سنجی: "اولسون" به منظور بررسی پویایی خانواده، مدلی بر پایه دو بعد سازگاری و انسجام (پیوستگی) پدید آورد.
اعتبار: هماهنگی درونی ، آلفا کرونباخ 0.77 برای سازگاری خانواده و 0.62 برای انسجام ، باز آزمایی 0.80
نمره گذاری
1 = Almost never‚ 2 = Once in a while‚ 3 = Sometimes‚ 4 = Frequently‚ 5 = Almost always
چگونگی دستیابی
منبع برای آگاهی بیشتر
Olson‚ D. H.‚ Portner‚ J.‚ & Bell R. Q. (1982). FACES II: Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales. Family Social Science‚ University of Minnesota‚ St Paul‚ Minnesota
Olson‚ David H.‚ Portner‚ J.and Lavee‚ Y. (1985). FACES-II. St Paul. Family Social Science‚ University of Minnesota.
Olson‚ David H. (1986). Circumplex Model VII: Validation Studies and FACES III. Family Process‚ 25(3); 337–351.
Olson‚ David H.‚ Sprenkle‚ Douglas H.‚ and Russell‚ Candyce S. (1979). Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems: I. Cohesion and Adaptability Dimensions‚ Family Types‚ and Clinical Applications. Family Process‚ 18(1); 3–28
Olson‚ D. H.‚ McCubbing‚ H. I.‚ Barnes‚ H.‚ Larsen‚ A.‚ Muxen‚ M.‚ & Wilson‚ M. (1985). Family inventories: Inventories in a national survey of families across the family life cycle (rev. ed.). St. Paul: University of Minnesota‚ Family Social Science.
Olson‚ D. H.‚ & Diesel‚ J. (1993). FACES III: Linear scoring and interpretation‚ St. Paul: University of Minnesota‚ Family Social Science.
Daley‚ James G.‚ Sowers-Hoagf‚ Karen and Thyer‚ Bruce A. (1990). Are FACES-II “family satisfaction’ scores valid”?. Journal of Family Therapy ( 1990) 12: 77-81
Tzeng‚ Oliver C. S . (1993). Measurement of love and intimate relations: Theories‚ scales‚ and applications for love development‚ maintenance‚ and dissolution. Westport‚ CT: Greenwood Publishing Group‚ Inc.