Job-related Self-efficacy Measure

Job-related Self-efficacy Measure
Riggs‚ Warka‚ Babasa‚ Betancourt‚ and Hooker‚1994
اندازه گیری خودکارآمدی وابسته به کار
Job-related Self-efficacy Measure
1.    I have confidence in my ability to do my job.
2.    There are some tasks required by my job that I cannot do well.
3.    When my performance is poor‚ it is due to my lack of ability.
4.    I doubt my ability to do my job.
5.    I have all the skills needed to perform my job very well.
6.    Most people in my line of work can do this job better than I can.
7.    I am an expert at my job.
8.    My future in this job is limited because of my lack of skills.
9.    I am very proud of my job skills and abilities.
10.I feel threatened when others watch me work.
Job-related Group efficacy Measure
1.    The group I work with has above average ability.
2.    This group is poor compared to other groups doing similar work.
3.    This group is not able to perform as well as it should.
4.    The members of this group have excellent educational skills.
5.    Some members of this group should be excluded due to lack of ability.
6.    This group is not very effective.
7.    Some members in this group cannot do their tasks well.
شرح سایت روان سنجی: این ابزار به اندازه گیری خودکارآمدی فرد در یک فعالیت ویژه می پردازد. نخستین بار برای شغل به کار گرفته شد، در سالهای بعد پژوهشگران با جایگزینی واژه هایی چون: تکلیف، گروه، مربی و یا درس، آن را به کارگرفته اند.
اعتبار: هماهنگی درونی، آلفا کرونباخ 0.86
نمره گذاری: توجه کنید، در برخی از نسخه ها، گویه ها به صورت مثبت نوشته شده اند و بنابراین وارون کردن مقیاس همانند بالا نیست.
Strongly Disagree‚ Disagree‚ Slightly Disagree‚ Neutral‚ Slightly Agree‚ Agree‚ And Strongly Agree
چگونگی دستیابی
منبع برای آگاهی بیشتر
Riggs‚ M. L.‚ & Knight‚ P. A. (1994). The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes: A causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology‚ 79(5)‚ 755-766.
Riggs‚ M. L.‚ Warka‚ J.‚ Babasa‚ B.‚ Betancourt‚ R.‚ & Hooker‚ S. (1994). Development and validation of self-efficacy and outcome expectancy scales for job-related applications. Educational and Psychological Measurement‚ 54(3)‚ 793-802.
Fogg‚ Rich‎ard John‚ "The effects of feedback and strategy on self-efficacy and computer task performance" (1995).Theses Digitization Project. 1023. http://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/1023