Moralization of Everyday Life Scale (MELS)

Moralization of Everyday Life Scale (MELS)
Lovett‚ Jordan & Wiltermuth‚ 2012
blovett@elmira.edu
مقیاس اخلاق گرایی روزمره
Factor 1
•    Keeping extra money accidentally dispensed from an ATM
•    Lying about a test score when reporting performance to a teacher
•    Feigning an injury to collect on insurance
•    Lying about one’s age to receive an age-based discount
•    Sneaking into a movie theater to see a movie without paying
Factor 2
•    Parking in a “handicapped” parking spot when not handicapped
•    Smoking a cigarette in a non-smoking section of a restaurant
•    Using someone else’s toothbrush without his or her permission
•    Failing to keep a commitment to help on a project for work
•    ha‎ving sex with someone while one’s partner is out of town
Factor 3
•    Feeling too tired to do laundry‚ so lying around in dirty clothes
•    Choosing to wake up late‚ despite ha‎ving a busy day ahead
•    Packing for a trip at the last minute
•    Purchasing a car without doing research on price or quality
•    Taking an elevator rather than walking up a single flight of stairs
Factor 4
•    Ignoring a driver whose car is stuck in the snow
•    Throwing away clothes rather than donating them to ch‎arity
•    Ignoring a woman struggling to carry bags of groceries
•    Failing to offer one’s seat on a bus to an elderly‚ disabled individual
•    Tripping on a rock but leaving it on the sidewalk where one tripped
Factor 5
•    A 40-year-old man ha‎ving consensual sex with an 18-year-old woman
•    An 18-year-old woman breaking an abstinence vow to have premarital sex
•    Getting a large tattoo covering the face and neck
•    Drinking 10 beers at a party and vomiting several times
•    Smoking marijuana at a party out of curiosity
Factor 6
•    A 13-year-old girl kissing her 14-year-old brother passionately on the mouth
•    Defecating‚ not washing one’s hands‚ and then preparing dinner for oneself
•    Wearing a pair of pants for three weeks without washing them
•    Choosing to flatulate while out to dinner with friends
•    Failing to shower for four days due to a lack of time
شرح سایت روان سنجی: این مقیاس برای اندازه گیری تمایل به اختصاص دادن وزن اخلاقی به رفتارهای روزمره، طراحی شده است.
Deception‚ Social-norm violations‚ Laziness‚ Failures to take opportunities‚ violations of the body; Behaviors that are generally considered disgusting.
اعتبار: هماهنگی درونی، آلفا برای کل 0.93، و برای خرده مقیاس ها 0.88، 0.85، 0.8، 0.87، 0.78و 0.86
نمره گذاری:
(not wrong at all; a perfectly OK action) to 6 (very wrong; an extremely immoral action).
چگونگی دستیابی
This instrument can be found at: https://www.marshall.usc.edu/sites/default/files/wiltermu/intellcont/lovett%20jordan%20%20wiltermuth%20%282012%29-1.pdf & http://www.thearda.com/Archive/Files/Codebooks/MORALITY_CB.asp#V94 & https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254302538
منبع برای آگاهی بیشتر
Lovett‚ B. J. (2005). A defense of prudential moralism. Journal of Applied Philosophy‚ 22‚ 159–168.
Lovett‚ B. J.‚ & Jordan‚ A. H. (2005). Moral values‚ moralism‚ and the 2004 presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy‚ 5‚ 165–175.
Lovett‚ Benjamin J.‚ Jordan‚ Alexander H. (2010). Levels of moralisation: a new conception of moral sensitivity. Journal of Moral Education‚ 39(2)‚ 175–189.
Lovett‚ Benjamin J.‚ Jordan‚ Alexander H. & Wiltermuth‚ Scott S. (2012): Individual Differences in the Moralization of Everyday Life‚ Ethics & Behavior‚ 22(4)‚ 248-257
http://www.dartmouth.edu/ch‎arajordan/papers/Lovett‚%20Jordan‚%20&%20Wiltermuth%20(2012)%20-%20MELS.pdf