روانسنجی
اولین سایت تخصصی فارسی تست های روان سنجی ، روان شناسی

Task Perceptions Scale
Steele-Johnson‚ Beauregard‚ Hoover‚ & Schmidt‚ 2000
debra.steele-johnson@wright.edu

Task Perceptions Measure
1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree)
Perceived Challenge Items:
1.    Performing this task was difficult.
2.    Performing this task is challenging.
3.    This task requires a lot of time studying the terms/definitions.
Perceived Effort Required Items:
1.    I put forth a lot of effort studying for this task.
2.    This task requires a lot of effort studying the terms/definitions.
Satisfaction With Performance Items:
1.    I am satisfied with my overall performance on the task during this session.
2.    I will be satisfied if I achieve the same performance level on the current task compared to the previous or next task performance level.
State Learning Goal Orientation Manipulation Check
1.    Developing various methods to remember the terms/definitions can increase my performance.
2.    I have thought of different ways in which to remember the terms/definitions.
3.    When I have difficulty remembering a term/definition‚ I try different approaches in order to remember them.
4.    I know how many matches I had in the previous session.
5.    I know whether I have improved over the previous session.
6.    Improving by more than 6 terms/definitions from one task session to the next is important to me.
State Performance Goal Orientation Manipulation Check
1.    Using a single method in order to remember the terms/definitions can increase my performance.
2.    I read and recite the terms/definitions in order to remember them.
3.    When I have difficulty remembering a term/definition‚ I read over those terms over again to remember them.
4.    I know how well I performed in this session in comparison to other people.
5.    I know whether I have increased my performance ranking from the previous session.
6.    Being among the top three highest ranked participants for each session is important to me.

1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).

This instrument can be found at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12271855  & https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=wright1401715350&disposition=inline
http://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2355&context=etd_all

Steele-Johnson‚ D.‚ Beauregard‚ R. S.‚ Hoover‚ P. B.‚ & Schmidt‚ A. M. (2000). Goal orientation and task demand effects on motivation‚ affect‚ and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology‚ 85(5)‚ 724-738.
Steele-Johnson‚ D.‚ Heintz‚ P.‚ Miller‚ C.E. (2008). Examining Situationally Induced State Goal Orientation Effects on Task Perceptions‚ Performance‚ and Satisfaction: A Two-Dimensional Conceptualization1Journal of Applied Social Psychology‚ 38(2)‚ 334–365.
Heintz‚ P.‚ Steele-Johnson‚ D. (2004). Clarifying the conceptual definitions of goal orientation dimensions: Competence‚ control‚ and evaluation. Organizational Analysis‚ 12(1)‚ 5-19.
Gore‚ Truman Joseph. (2014). Goal Orientations and Self-Efficacy Interactions on Self-Set Goal Level. Wright State University‚ ma‎ster of Science Thesis.