Revised Religious Fundamentalism Scale

Revised Religious Fundamentalism Scale (RRF)
Altemeyer‚ B. & Hunsberger‚ B. (2004)
مقیاس بنیادگرایی مذهبی
1. God has given humanity‚ a complete unfailing guide to happiness and salvation‚ which must be totally followed.
2. No single book of religious teachings contains all the intrinsic‚ fundamental truths about life.
3. The basic cause of evil in this world is Satan‚ who is still constantly and ferociously fighting against God.
4. It is more important to be a good person than to believe in God and the right religion.
5. There is a particular set of religious teachings in this world that are so true‚ you can’t go any “deeper” because they are the basic‚ bedrock message God has given humanity.
6. When you get right down to it‚ there are basically two kinds of people in the world: the righteous who will be rewarded by God; and the rest who will not.
7. Scriptures may contain general truths‚ but they should NOT be considered completely‚ literally true from beginning to end.
8. To lead the best‚ most meaningful life‚ one must belong to the one‚ fundamentally true religion.
9. “Satan” is just the name people give to their own bad impulses. There is really no such thing as a diabolical “Prince of Darkness” who tempts us.
10. Whenever science and sacred scripture conflict‚ science is probably right.
11. The fundamentals of God’s religion should never be tampered with‚ or compromised with others’ beliefs.
12. All of the religions in the world have flaws and wrong teachings. There is no perfectly true and right religion.
شرح تارنمای روان سنجی: این مقیاس برای اندازه گیری این باور مردم که دین دارای یک حقیقت کامل است و مردم را به رابطه ای منحصر به فرد هدایت می کند، طراحی شده است.
اعتبار: آلفا کرونباخ 0.93
چگونگی دستیابی
This instrument can be found on page 36 of Religious Anti-Gay Messages’ Effect on Attitudes toward Sexual and Religious Groups ‚ available online at: https://repositories.tdl.org/ttu-ir/handle/2346/45412
نمره گذاری
–4 =very strongly disagree‚ –3=strongly disagree‚ –2= moderately disagree‚ –1=slightly disagree‚ +1=slightly agree‚ +2=moderately agree‚ +3=strongly agree‚ +4= very strongly agree‚ If you feel exactly and precisely neutral about an item‚ write down a “0” in the space provided
*Reverse coded items
Note: Code on a 1 to 9 scale (–4 = 1; –3 = 2; etc.).
منبع
Altemeyer‚ B.‚ & Hunsberger‚ B. (2004). A Revised Religious Fundamentalism Scale: The short and sweet of it. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion‚ 14‚ 47-54
Altemeyer‚ B. & Hunsberger‚ B. (1992). Authoritarianism‚ religious fundamentalism‚ quest and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion‚ 2‚ 113-133.
Hester‚ Neil. 2012. Religious Anti-Gay Messages’ Effect on Attitudes toward Sexual and Religious Groups. https://repositories.tdl.org/ttu-ir/handle/2346/45412
   
آذر 1402
خرداد 1396
اسفند 1395
فروردین 1394
خرداد 1393
فروردین 1393
اسفند 1392
بهمن 1392
آذر 1390
تیر 1390
خرداد 1390
اردیبهشت 1390
اردیبهشت 1390
بهمن 1389
اردیبهشت 1389
اردیبهشت 1389
آبان 1388
شهریور 1388
مرداد 1388
تیر 1388
خرداد 1388
   
سپاس بیکران به حضور دکتر علی اکبر سیف که هر دانش آموخته این حوزه از کتاب های او بی نیاز نبوده است .
   
کلیه حقوق به آرین آرانی متعلق است.