Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS)
Busby‚ Christensen‚ Crane and Larson (1995)
مقیاس بازنگری شده سازگاری همسران
Most persons have disagreements in their relationships. Please indicate below the approximate extent of agreement or disagreement between you and your partner for each item on the following list.
If you are currently in a relationship that has lasted one month or more‚ answer about that relationship.
If you have been in a relationship that has lasted one month or more (but are not now)‚ answer about the most recent relationship.
1. Religious matters
2. Demonstrations of affection
3. Making major decisions
4. Sex relations
5. Conventionality (correct or proper behavior)
6. Career decisions
7. How often do you discuss or have you considered divorce‚ separation‚ or terminating your relationship?
8. How often do you and your partner quarrel?
8. How often do you regret that you are dating?
9. Do you ever regret that you married (or lived together)?
10. How often do you and your mate “get on each other’s nerves’’?
11. Do you and your partner engage in outside interests together?
How often would you say the following events occur (or occurred) between you and your partner (mate)?
12. Have a stimulating exchange of ideas?
13. Work together on a project
14. Calmly discuss something
شرح سایت روان سنجی: این ابزار برپایه مقیاس 32 ماده ای "اسپانیر 1976" پدیدآمده است. این مقیاس هفت زمینه از روابط زوجین را در سه خرده مقیاس توافق، خشنودی و انسجام می سنجد.
(1) Dyadic Consensus – degree to which respondent agrees with partner
(2) Dyadic Satisfaction -- degree to which respondent feels satisfied with partner
(3) Dyadic Cohesion –degree to which respondent and partner participate in activities together
ساختار عاملی و اعتبار این مقیاس توسط: امید عیسی نژادو همکاران در سال 1387 انجام شده است.
اعتبار : آلفا کرونباخ 0.90، دو نیمه کردن گاتمن 0.94 و دونیمه کردن اسپیرمن- براون 0.95. عیسی نژاد اعتبار برای عامل های رضایت مندی، توافق و انسجام را در ایران به ترتیب 0.91، 0.89، 0.86 و برای کل پرسشنامه 0.92 گزارش کرده است.
چگونگی دستیابی
This instrument can be found at: http://www.coloradoeft.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Revised-Dyadic-Adjustment-Scale-RDAS-1.pdf
نمره گذاری
نقطه برش نسخه انگلیسی این مقیاس عدد 48 است.
Items 1-6: 0= Always Disagree; 1= Almost Always Disagree; 2= Frequently Disagree; 3= Occasionally Agree; 4= Almost Always Agree; 5= Always
Items 7-10: 0= All the Time; 1= Most of the time; 2= More often than not; 3= Occasionally; 4= Rarely; 5= Never
Items 11: 4=Every day; 3=Almost every day; 2=Occasionally; 1=Rarely; 0=Never
Items 12-14: 0=Never; 1= Less than once a month; 2= Once or twice a month; 3= Once or twice a week; 4= Once a day; 5= More often
منبع برای آگاهی بیشتر
Busby‚ D. M.‚ Christensen‚ C.‚ Crane‚ D. R.‚ & Larson‚ J. H. (1995). A revision of the dyadic adjustment scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy andmultidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy‚ 21(3)‚ 289-308.
Crane‚ D. R.‚ Middleton‚ K. C.‚ & Bean‚ R. A. (2000). Establishing criterion scores for the KansasMarital Satisfaction Scale and the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale. American Journal ofFamily Therapy‚ 28(1)‚ 53-60.
Isanezhad. Omid‚ Ahmadi. Seid-Ahmad‚ Bahrami. Fatemeh‚ Baghban-Cichani. Iran‚ Farajzadegan. Ziba‚ and Etemadi. Ozra. 2012. Factor Structure and Reliability of the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS) in Iranian Population. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences‚6(2): 55–61.
Esanezhad.O‚ Ahmadi. A‚ Etemadi. O‚. (2008).Mental effect on the quality of marital welfare. University of Tehran; Proceedings of the Third National Congress of Family Pathology‚ 2008. [Persian]