Dimensions of Religious Ideology

Dimensions of Religious Ideology
Putney and Middleton 1961
ابعاد مرام دینی
Orthodoxy Scale
1.    I believe that there is a physical Hell where men are punished after death for the sins of their lives.
2.    I believe there is a supernatural being‚ the Devil‚ who continually tries to lead men into sin.
3.    To me the most important work of the church is the saving of souls.
4.    I believe that there is a life after death.
5.    I believe there is a Divine plan and purpose for every living person and thing.
6.    The only benefit one receives from prayer is psychological.*
Fanaticism Scale
1.    I have a duty to help those who are confused about religion.
2.    Even though it may cr‎eate some unpleasant situations‚ it is important to help people become enlightened about religion.
3.    There is no point In arguing about religion‚ because there is little chance of changing other people's minds.*
4.    It doesn't really matter what an individual believes about religion as long as he is happy with it.*
5.    I believe the world would really be a better place if more people held the views about religion which I hold.
6.    I believe the world's problems are seriously aggravated by the fact that so many people are misguided about religion.
Importance Scale
1.    My ideas about religion are one of the most important parts of my philosophy of life.
2.    I find that my ideas on religion have a considerable influence on my views in other areas.
3.    Believing as I do about religion is very important to being the kind of person I want to be.
4.    If my ideas about religion were different‚ I believe that my way of life would be very different.
5.    Religion is a subject in which I am not particularly interested.*
6.    I very often think about matters relating to religion.
Ambivalence Scale
The fourth dimension‚ ambivalence‚ called for a Likert-type rating of the statement: "Although one is stronger than the other‚ there is part of me which believes in religion and part of me which does no."
* Reverse scored
شرح سایت روان سنجی: این ابزار بر این فرضیه استوار است که مرام مذهبی ابعاد "سنتی معمولی، تعصب، اهمیت و تردید (دودلی) دارد.
orthodoxy‚ fanaticism‚ importance‚ and ambivalence
اعتبار: سنتی معمولی، تعصب، اهمیت به ترتیب 0.67، 0.78 و 0.64 (پونی و میدلتون، به نقل از سامرز و هیوارد، 2010) و  0.69، 0.22، 0.84. (پریمن، بارنارد و ترل، 2018) ، گزارش اعتبار در منابع مختلف است.
نمره گذاری:
7= strong agreement; 6= moderate agreement; 5= slight agreement; 4= no answer or don't know; 3= slight disagreement; 2= moderate disagreement; 1= strong disagreement.
چگونگی دستیابی
This instrument can be found at: Measures of social psychological attitudes
منبع برای آگاهی بیشتر
Putney‚ S. and Middleton‚ R. (1961). Dimensions and correlates of religious ideologies. Social Forces‚ 39(4)‚ 285-290.
Middleton‚ R. and Putney‚ S. (1962) Religion‚ normative standards‚ and behavior. Sociometry‚ 25(2)‚ pp. 141-52.
Robinson‚ John P.‚ Shaver‚ Phillip R. (1969). Measures of Political Attitudes. Institute for Social Research‚ University of Michigan/. Ann Arbor‚ Michigan
Perryman‚ Mandy.‚ Barnard‚ Marie.‚ Terrell‚ Kassie. (2018). Counselor and Social Worker Perceptions of Sexual Minorities Related to Religiosity and Political Ideology. Social Work Values and Ethics‚ 15(1)‚ 4-12.
Summers‚ Alicia .‚ Hayward‚ R. David and Miller‚ Monica K.(2010) .Death Qualification as Systematic Exclusion of Jurors With Certain Religious and Other ch‎aracteristics .Journal of Applied Social Psychology‚ 40(12)‚ 3218–3234.
خرداد 1396
اسفند 1395
آبان 1395
فروردین 1394
خرداد 1393
فروردین 1393
اسفند 1392
بهمن 1392
دی 1390
آذر 1390
تیر 1390
خرداد 1390
اردیبهشت 1390
بهمن 1389
دی 1389
اردیبهشت 1389
دی 1388
آبان 1388
شهریور 1388
مرداد 1388
تیر 1388
خرداد 1388

سپاس بیکران حضور دکتر باقر ثنایی ، به خاطر تلاش هایش در حوزه سنجش خانواده و ازدواج . به امید روزی که محضرش را درک کنم .


کلیه حقوق به آرین آرانی متعلق است.